Commission Agendas | previous page
South Dakota Public Utilities Commission
May 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. CDT
Room 413, Capitol Building
Pierre, South Dakota
NOTE: If you wish to join this meeting by conference call, please contact the Commission at 605-773-3201 by 5:00 p.m. CDT on Wednesday, May 16, 2012. Lines are limited and are given out on a first come, first served basis, subject to possible reassignment to accommodate persons who must appear in a proceeding. Ultimately, if you wish to participate in the Commission Meeting and a line is not available, you may have to appear in person.
NOTE: To listen to the Commission Meeting live please go to the PUC's website www.puc.sd.gov and click on the LIVE link on the home page. The Commission requests persons who will only be listening to proceedings and not actively appearing in a case listen via the web cast to free phone lines for those who have to appear. The Commission meetings are archived on the PUC's website under the Commission Actions tab, Click on "Commission Meeting Archives," to access the recordings.
NOTE: Notice is further given to persons with disabilities that this Commission meeting is being held in a physically accessible place. If you have special needs, please notify the Commission and we will make all necessary arrangements.
AGENDA OF AD HOC COMMISSION MEETING
1. TC09-098 In the Matter of the Complaint filed by South Dakota Network, LLC against Sprint Communications Company L.P. Regarding Failure to Pay Intrastate Centralized Equal Access Charges and to Immediately Pay Undisputed Portions of SDN's Invoices
In the Matter of the Third Party Complaint Sprint Communications Company LP against Northern Valley Communications, Inc. and Capital Telephone Company (Staff Attorney: Karen Cremer)
SDN submits this complaint against Sprint for 1) failing to pay intrastate centralized equal access charges at the rates approved by the SDPUC, 2) failing to immediately pay undisputed portions of SDN's invoices as required by SDN's Tariff, and 3) for payment by Sprint of SDN's costs of action, reasonable attorney's fees incurred by SDN, and for twice the amount of damages sustained by SDN, if SDN is required to recover its damages by suit or on appeal. On February 15, 2012, Northern Valley Communications LLC filed a Motion to Compel against Sprint. On March 12, 2012, Sprint filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. On April 17, 2012, Sprint filed a Motion for Protective Order regarding Northern Valley's Corporate Deposition Notice.
TODAY, shall the Commission grant Sprint's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment? AND, shall the Commission grant Northern Valley Communications LLC's Motion to Compel? AND, shall the Commission grant Sprint's Motion for Protective Order regarding Northern Valley Communications LLC's Corporate Disposition Notice?
/S/ Cindy Kemnitz
May 10, 2012